Wednesday, September 9, 2009

New laws strengthen seat belt and child safety seat requirements

Buckle up in the back seat too.

Starting Sept. 1, as required by House Bill 537, all occupants of a passenger vehicle, no matter their age or where they are sitting in the vehicle, must be secured by a safety belt. Maximum fines can reach as high as $200, plus court costs. (The previous law exempted anyone 17 and older from wearing a seat belt in the back seat.)

The law also adds seat belt requirements for larger passenger vans.* In addition, children younger than 8 must be in the appropriate child safety seat.
(This new law makes no changes to pick-up bed and school bus requirements.)

Buckle children into the appropriate child safety seat.

A new law (Senate Bill 61) amends the existing statute regarding child passenger safety seats by requiring that any child younger than 8 be restrained in an approved child safety seat system unless the child is taller than 4 feet, 9 inches in height.
The law becomes effective on Sept. 1, 2009, but tickets for this offense cannot be issued until June 1, 2010. Police officers are allowed to issue a warning before that date. However, the previous law remains in effect for now and requires children younger than 5 and less than 36 inches in height be in a child safety seat, and tickets can still be issued for this violation.

No children younger than 5 are allowed on motorcycles.

HB 537 also prohibits a motorcycle operator from carrying a passenger under the age of 5 unless the child is seated in a sidecar attached to the motorcycle.
For more information on properly installing child safety seat systems, please go to this link http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/carseat.htm.

* A 15-passenger van is defined as a passenger van designed to transport 15 or fewer passengers, including the driver. This law applies to third-party transport service providers when transporting clients pursuant to a contract to provide nonemergency Medicaid transportation. (Previously, these providers were exempt from the specific safety belt requirements.)

No comments:

Post a Comment